The idolatrous discarnation of social media

by Mike on September 1, 2010

I learned a new word today cour­tesy of Tim Challies who wrote some advice for pastors on using Facebook. He commented that there is a risk of becoming discarnate by substi­tuting an online pres­ence for real in-the-flesh (incarnate) inter­ac­tions with people. His use of the word ‘disin­carnate’ imme­di­ately caused me to think of Christ as God incarnate (as I suspect was Tim’s inten­tion) and now the Church as the body of Christ in the world, in contrast to the strange ethereal melting pot of ideas and outbursts that is the internet and social media.

We now even even speak of having an online or virtual pres­ence, in effect creating (or re-creating) ourselves in our own image. The innate sinful human nature so exchanges the glory of God incarnate in Christ for a cheap lie (Romans 1:21–23) that the literal images we use in social media to represent our pres­ence are perversely called ‘avatars’ (the mani­fest­a­tion of a Hindu deity).

The more I ponder this, the more abhor­rent our self-idolatry and discarna­tion of true rela­tion­ships appears to my Christian mind. God became flesh and dwelt amoung us (John 1:14), the final commis­sion from Jesus was to (phys­ic­ally) “go and make disciples” (Matthew 28:19). As Christians we are the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:27) and while we are in the flesh we are to labour for the progress and joy of other believers (Philippians 1:24–25).

Both the first and second command­ments of the deca­logue (Exodus 20:3–4) stand opposed to the sort of virtual persona that is commonly used in social media and other realms of the internet. God delights to see truth in our inner being (Psalm 51:6) and out of such truth­ful­ness we must not project a false image of ourselves into cyberspace.

Beyond that, we also need to humble ourselves in acknow­ledg­ment that it is only God who is omni­present, only he can promise to be with us always (Matthew 28:20), we are finite — limited be both time and space. The nature of such limit­a­tions imposed by God should alert us to the import­ance of our phys­ical lives and face-to-face relationships.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Helpful (0) Boring (0)

Be the first to comment

Moralistic therapeutic deism

by Mike on August 31, 2010

What on earth is ‘moral­istic thera­peutic deism’?

This is a term used by Kenda Creasy Dean, a professor at Princeton Theological Seminary and the author of Almost Christian, a book based upon research into the faith of 3,300 American teen­agers. According to a recent article on the CNN website it means:

… a watered-down faith that portrays God as a “divine ther­apist” whose chief goal is to boost people’s self-esteem.

The article is very good and I recom­mend reading it, whether you are a parent or a teen­ager or are simply inter­ested in the state of faith in our society. While this is obvi­ously about American teen­agers and the fail­ings of the church in that nation, I think it applies fairly well to New Zealand also.

I partic­u­larly like the recom­mend­a­tion of what parents should do to avoid teaching our kids a false gospel:

What can a parent do then?

Get “radical,” Dean says.

She says parents who perform one act of radical faith in front of their chil­dren convey more than a multi­tude of sermons and mission trips.

A parent’s radical act of faith could involve some­thing as simple as spending a summer in Bolivia working on an agri­cul­tural renewal project or turning down a more lucrative job offer to stay at a strug­gling church, Dean says.

But it’s not enough to be radical — parents must explain “this is how Christians live,” she says.

“If you don’t say you’re doing it because of your faith, kids are going to say my parents are really nice people,” Dean says. “It doesn’t register that faith is supposed to make you live differ­ently unless parents help their kids connect the dots.”

This is a chal­lenge to me to consider my own faith in Christ and how I live it in the real world — is the call of Christ real enough to me to result in actions which make my kids ask, “why do you choose to live like this Dad?”

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Helpful (0) Boring (0)

Be the first to comment

The Revealing Light, David Holmes 2006

This sermon looks at Romans 7:7–25, known by some as the ‘Dr. Seuss passage’.

There is a lot of debate about this passage, regarding the state of the person strug­gling with sin in verses 14 to 25 — is this a Jew under the law? Any non-Christian? A so-called ‘carnal Christian’ or a true Christian? At the risk of offending someone, my personal view is that these argu­ments gener­ally miss the point. Paul does not have a flattened view of human nature, it seems that he sees our nature as a complex thing with many inter­acting influ­ences and nuances which all combine to affect how we think and act. I find it helpful to think of an opal, which has many different colours and planes within it all reflecting light differ­ently to combine and give it beauty.

I am not going to dig into the argu­ment of that issue here, my personal view is that throughout this passage Paul is describing his own exper­i­ence as a Christian. A signi­ficant factor contrib­uting to my view on this is that I know I am born again, but I also know that this passage accur­ately describes my own struggles, not just in the past but ongoing in my Christian life.

With that clari­fic­a­tion of my stance on inter­preting this passage, I will now look at what it is telling us. To see this we need a quick recap of his argu­ment so far: in Romans 2:13 Paul states that it is not hearers of the law who will be justi­fied, but those who do the law. He shows that outward cultural conformity alone does not make someone a Jew but rather obed­i­ence to the law from the heart, by the Spirit.

So is there any advantage in being Jewish then, if even they do not gain life through the law?

Yes, they inher­ited the Scriptures. Yet their right­eous­ness does not come from that, right­eous­ness before God comes only by faith.

Does faith in Christ then over­throw the law?

No, faith upholds the law. Faith gives us access to the grace of God, this grace gives us the free gift of right­eous­ness through Jesus Christ. This right­eous­ness in Christ covers all sin.

So does this mean we can sin anyway since grace will cover our sin?

No! We are baptized into Christ’s death and so have died to sin. We should avoid presenting ourselves as slaves to sin, rather we need to present ourselves to God as slaves to right­eous­ness. The wages of sin is death.

Does this mean that the law is sin since it brings death?

No, the law serves to show sin for what it is. Sin lies dormant until we attempt to obey God, then it becomes active and causes us to disobey God’s commands. It is sin that brings death. The law is holy, right­eous and good.

So did what is good (the law) bring death?

No, sin brings death, its deceitful working through God’s good command­ments shows how evil sin is that it can still bring death even using what is good as its device. Sin uses the weak­ness in us all to make us do what we don’t want to do. The fact that we hate the sin we commit shows that we agree with God’s judg­ment of sin as being evil.

Therefore, this section from Romans 7:7–25 is intended to show us that the law is not at fault for our sin, the problem lies within us as sin, we have a sinful nature ready to oppose every command­ment of God’s. This is quite notice­able if you look for these two ideas in each verse from 13–25.

  • [13] Did that which is good, then, bring death to me? By no means! It was sin, produ­cing death in me through what is good, in order that sin might be shown to be sin, and through the command­ment might become sinful beyond measure.
    • The law is what is good.
    • It is sin that produces death.
  • [14] For we know that the law is spir­itual, but I am of the flesh, sold under sin.
    • The law is spiritual.
    • I am sold under sin.
  • [15] For I do not under­stand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate.
    • I do not do what I want (obey the law).
    • I do the thing I hate (sin).
  • [16] Now if I do what I do not want, I agree with the law, that it is good.
    • I agree with the law, that it is good.
    • I do what I do not want when I sin.
  • [17] So now it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me.
    • Sin dwelling in me is what makes me sin.
  • [18] For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out.
    • I desire to do what is right (obey the law).
    • Nothing good dwells in my flesh (only sin, which opposes what is good).
  • [19] For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing.
    • The good I want to do is to obey the law.
    • The evil I do not want is the sin I commit.
  • [20] Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me.
    • I do what I do not want (I want to obey the law).
    • It is no longer my overall will but sin which causes me to sin.
  • [21] So I find it to be a law that when I want to do right, evil lies close at hand.
    • I want to do right (obey the law).
    • But evil (sin) lies close at hand.
  • [22] For I delight in the law of God, in my inner being,
    • My delight is in the law, not in sin.
  • [23] but I see in my members another law waging war against the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members.
    • The law of my mind is the law of God.
    • The law of sin holds me captive to it’s will.
  • [24] Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?
    • Death is due to sin.
  • [25] Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin.
    • The law is what I want to serve because it is good.
    • My body sins because I am serving the law of sin.

The main point is obvious, the law is good. The evil I do comes from within me and I have no power in myself to stop sinning.

An important message coming out of this passage is that you are not the sum of your sins. Christ has paid for the offence of your sin against God and in verse 17 we see that as we sin it is a part of us that sins while another part of us hates the very thing we are doing. I can hate my sinful nature and wish it dead without being suicidal — God also hates my sinful nature and has in fact already cruci­fied it in Christ. But even though my body is deceived by sin and dead as a consequence, the Spirit of God, who raised Jesus from the dead, dwells in me and will give life to my body also (Romans 8:10–11).

We live in the ‘already, not yet’ between Christ’s first and second comings. We are fully redeemed and cleansed in Christ but we are still awaiting the redemp­tion of our bodies. These bodies we inhabit still bear the curse upon Adam — our bodies will die, they get sick, we are weak, we have desires that are opposed to the law of God.

This warfare between obed­i­ence to God and sin has been char­ac­ter­istic of being human right from the very start. In Genesis 3 the serpent deceives Eve and Adam. In Genesis 4:7 God warns Cain that sin is crouching at the door, it desires to master him but Cain must rule over it. The book of Job is about this struggle — Job continues to believe that God is good despite the calamity he suffers. God gives Satan permis­sion to torment Job and in a similar way Jesus permits Satan to sift Peter — weak­ness wins tempor­arily and Peter denies Jesus. In Galatians 5:16–18 Paul warns Christians of this ongoing struggle between the flesh and the Spirit. Peter mentions the war in 1 Peter 2:11, James mentions it several times (James 1:13–15 and James 4:1–8) and John speaks of it in 1 John 2:15–16).

Regardless of what theo­lo­gical boffins might argue, we know that the struggle to live obed­i­ently to Christ is an ines­cap­able reality of being Christian. The unre­lenting nature of this battle can lead us at times to consider giving up, but we have been prom­ised help. God does send His Holy Spirit to help us in our weak­ness, sin cannot totally master us if we are in Christ and we are forgiven for our sins.

Remember that you are not defined by your sin, neither are you defined by your human or phys­ical weak­ness. You are defined by your status in Christ. If you are in Christ you are an eternal being of total purity and right­eous­ness — the purity and right­eous­ness of God. If you are in Christ you will know because your desire will be to please God. Even as you sin your heart will long to be obed­ient to Christ rather than being weak and sinful.

Take heart from Paul’s words in Philippians 3:12–14:

Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect, but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own. Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own. But one thing I do: forget­ting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.

Even though you are weak, don’t wallow in weak­ness and sin — lift your eyes and heart to Christ. Then press on to be found in Him.

Artwork

The painting featured in this post is an original work by my neigh­bour, David Holmes, titled ‘The Revealing Light’. It portrays the battle within between the renewed heart and indwelling sin, with the light of the Holy Spirit and God’s word revealing this struggle to us.

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (1) Interesting (0) Helpful (0) Boring (0)

Be the first to comment

Spring-cleaning my soul

22 August 2010

We are having a bit of an early spring-clean in our house — recon­fig­uring our storage spaces, sorting through our stuff and getting rid of whatever is not worth keeping. We are tired of trip­ping over clutter. There is also a certain pleasure in simply tidying up all those things which we use a lot and are necessary …

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (0) Interesting (0) Helpful (1) Boring (0)
0 comments Read the full post →

Time out

10 August 2010

You may have noticed that my blog posts have been some­what infre­quent over the last week or two. I have a lot happening in my life currently which has consumed my time, focus and energy, meaning no resources are left for writing blog posts. This has been both­ering me, I feel that I made a commit­ment (to myself, at least) …

What do you think of this post?
Awesome (1) Interesting (1) Helpful (0) Boring (0)
2 comments Read the full post →